January Movie Reviews
- January 28th, 2010
- Write comment
Avatar
Rated: PG-13
Starring: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang
Despite some 2D character depictions, this 3D spectacle is worth your dollars.
I must acknowledge the blue, six-legged, two-trunked elephant in the room. It’s name is Avatar and it has made 1.8 billion at the time of this writing. Is it a good movie? That answer is simple: It is a great movie. While it does have a few bad points, it has deserved every cent it grossed.
Avatar tells the story of Jake Sully, an ex-marine (Sam Worthington) recruited to participate in a scientific expedition on the alien moon of Pandora. He is given the opportunity to pilot, or inhabit, a genetically engineered version of the local sentient species called an avatar and gain back the mobility he lost while in the military. While in his avatar, he is tasked to convince the inhabitants of the planet, the Na’vi, to leave their home so that a mining venture can extract ore from beneath it.
There are two things that you must know before going into the film. First: the movie is long at a bit more than two and a half hours. Second: see it in 3-D. The pacing of the film is such that you won’t notice its length with slightly unequal parts action and drama. I’ve seen the film in 2-D and 3-D and I can confidently say that the experience is worth the extra price of admission.
The film is stunning with vibrant colors in dense jungles, sweeping expanses in flight and majestic, if floating, mountains. Even the science labs and the military base are impressive. The performances of the actors were strong with a notable mention of Zoe Saldana’s portrayal of Nytiri, Jake Sully’s guide within the Na’vi people. I was stunned to witness the aptitude of the actors playing the Na’vi and the technical teams responsible for animating their computer-generated counterpart to ultimately move the characters from ‘blue aliens’ to living, breathing people.
There has been some mention in new articles of the unfortunate two-dimensional portrayal of the military characters, the similarities between the Na’vi and the indigenous people of our own history, and the resonance of historical events on Earth. While these things may exist, they do not detract from the experience of the film as a sweeping journey, a coming of age story, and as a study in the technical marvel of film. I encourage all viewers to attend the film with an open mind and ridiculous 3-D glasses.
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
Rated: PG-13
Starring: Heath Ledger, Johnny Depp, Colin Farrell, Jude Law, Christopher Plummer
Stunning visuals and blazing performances saves the sometimes hard to follow narrative.
When Doctor Parnassus (Christopher Plummer), a millennia-old monk turned circus mentalist, is confronted with the loss of his daughter, he employs the aid of the wily Tony (Heath Ledger) to help him win a wager with the devil (Tom Waits). That’s the simple version of the plot of the film, but the actual experience involves mythology, psychology, and Burton-ology.
The film is good. Good in the sense that you might find yourself on a lazy Sunday flipping through cable channels, read the synopsis and think “Hmm, that looks good.” Not good in the sense that it is a must-see spectacle. The performances by the actors are very well done with the adversarial/strange camaraderie between Doctor Parnassus and Mr. Nick (read: the devil) are some of the best scenes in the film. The environment and sets are also well imagined. A great deal of the mundane portion of the story occurs in a horse-drawn traveling stage that invokes imaginings of old-style circuses and traveling shows. The fantastical portions of the film, which occur in the titular Imaginarium, are vibrant and whimsical with a hint of Burton-style sinister.
While the settings and performances proved the strong points of the film, the storytelling seems to be its weak point. The story of Doctor Parnassus is a strange, twisted thing that wasn’t given enough screen time for the audience to fully grasp the scope of his ability and, ultimately, the intensity of his sorrow. Additionally, the Imaginarium itself was vaguely explained and it isn’t until the later half of the film that it is fully explained. It felt as if there was a great deal missing from the film that could have made it far better than what was experienced.
I must note that this was Heath Ledger’s last role in a film. He passed away midway through filming, but had completed all, or mostly all, of the mundane scenes. In the fantastical scenes, he is replaced by Johnny Depp, Colin Farrell, and Jude Law in some of the most inspired plot explanation that I’ve seen in a while. Watching them give their own interpretation of the character of Tony was well worth the price of a matinee.
Sherlock Holmes
Rated: PG-13
Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Mark Strong
This gritty, well-paced action-mystery does the titular character justice.
I like mystery. I like action. I like Sherlock Holmes. If you are like me, you’ll find that a combination of these things would seem antithetical as it pertains to the common portrayal of the great detective. Usually portrayed as a bookish, monocled, pipe-smoking, English gentleman, Robert Downey Jr.’s Holmes is a refreshing re-imagining of a man so brilliant as to very nearly be a super-man.
The plot is simple: Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong) comes back from the dead to terrorize London. Frankly, that’s all beside the point. The point is: the film opens with Sherlock Holmes kicking a guard’s proverbial butt with such efficiency that one wonders what else he’s capable of. Fortunately for us, the film proceeds to show us how excellent a detective Holmes is.
Beyond the detective work, the film also shows us the human side of Holmes. He is condescending, sometimes callous, and socially awkward. More than that, though, we see the pain one experiences from having such a powerful intellect. We also see the fine line that Holmes walks between genius and madness. To this end, his companion, Dr. John Watson (Jude Law) provides the understanding foil to Holmes’ genius, focusing him and supporting him through his eccentricities.
The environment and color of the film skews toward a darker, grittier London while still touching on the grandeur of the privileged in certain scenes. The plot is complicated with new twists and turns added at an even, steady pace. There is action, martial arts, and a very, very large explosion, things that other Holmes films had reduced to simple fires and running after a shadowy figure down a dark alley. This is today’s Sherlock Holmes.
The film leaves me with positive feelings about the future of the Holmes franchise and Downey’s career.
This gritty, well-paced action-mystery does the titular character justice.